A downloads is the number of how many times the torrent has been downloaded according to its tracker record
A seeder is a peer that has a complete copy of the torrent and still offers it for upload. The more seeders there are, the better the chances are for completion of the file
A leech is usually a peer who has a negative effect on the swarm by having a very poor share ratio - in other words, downloading much more than they upload. Most leeches are users on asymmetric internet connections who do not leave their BitTorrent client open to seed the file after their download has completed. However, some leeches intentionally avoid uploading by using modified clients or excessively limiting their upload speed. The term leech, however, can be used simply to describe a peer - or any client that does not have 100% of the data
A peer is one instance of a BitTorrent client running on a computer on the Internet that other clients connect to and transfer data. Usually a peer does not have the complete file, but only parts of it, however, peer can be used to refer to any participant in the swarm (in this case, also known as a client). Note that the colloquial definition of peer is anybody, leech or seed, involved in a torrent
A health (or avaiability) the number of full copies of the file available to the client. Each seeder adds 1.0 to this number, as they have one complete copy of the file. A connected peer with a fraction of the file available adds that fraction to the availability, if no other peer has this part of the file. (ie. a peer with 65.3% of the file downloaded increases the availability by 0.653, when two peers who both have the same 50% of the file downloaded and there is one seeder the availability is 1.5)
Torrent details
Download torrent:
Direct HTTP Download - download this torrent as a regular HTTP file using Furk.net servers as an accelerated proxy.
Note: Unlike other torrent indexes we find more trackers for a torrent and put them sorted by seeders into the torrent upon every download. This should improve download speed. Extra trackers marked with '+' sign. If you have problems with this then let us know.
3. Feb 1980- The American Edit, "Caligula", the same as the Italian edit,but runs a full 156 minutes. Released on Video in the USA in January1984, with a compressed running time of 148 minutes, even though thebox says it runs 143 minutes. This version was billed as "unrated". Aswell, this is the version that was re-issued in 1991 on VHS as the"Special 10th Anniversary Edition", with the correct running time of148 min. These liner notes on the 1991 VHS ended up on the 1999DVD.from caligulathemovie.com
3. Feb 1980- The American Edit, "Caligula", the same as the Italian edit,but runs a full 156 minutes. Released on Video in the USA in January1984, with a compressed running time of 148 minutes, even though thebox says it runs 143 minutes. This version was billed as "unrated". Aswell, this is the version that was re-issued in 1991 on VHS as the"Special 10th Anniversary Edition", with the correct running time of148 min. These liner notes on the 1991 VHS ended up on the 1999DVD.from caligulathemovie.com
3. Feb 1980- The American Edit, "Caligula", the same as the Italian edit,but runs a full 156 minutes. Released on Video in the USA in January1984, with a compressed running time of 148 minutes, even though thebox says it runs 143 minutes. This version was billed as "unrated". Aswell, this is the version that was re-issued in 1991 on VHS as the"Special 10th Anniversary Edition", with the correct running time of148 min. These liner notes on the 1991 VHS ended up on the 1999DVD.from caligulathemovie.com
The picture quality itself is not bad, though I've seen better. Apparently even the original 35 mm prints looked like shit, though, due to the low quality film/cameras used in production, so it's hard to judge how much can be attributed to poor compression. As always, a little postprocessing, a little artificial noise can mask some of the obvious compression artifacts quite effectively.What really bothers one is the jerky framerate. (And I have tested this with multiple decoders, players, and on two different machines. Definitely inherent in the file.) The only reason I can think of for this is that the DVD from which this was ripped was interlaced, not progressive. The movie is still watchable, albeit unpleasant.